Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Cari Blog Ini

The Economic And Military Aid

US Aid to PH Down Despite EDCA, No $500 Million Coming

The Economic and Military Aid

The US has reduced its economic and military aid to the Philippines even after the implementation of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA).

In 2016, the US provided ₱14.5 billion ($286 million) in military assistance to the Philippines. This was down from the ₱17.1 billion($340 million) provided in 2015.

In 2017, the US provided ₱9.1 billion ($180 million) in military assistance to the Philippines. This was further down from the amount provided in 2016.


Military Pact

In 2014, the Philippines and the United States signed the EDCA. This agreement allows the US to build and operate military facilities in the Philippines.

The EDCA was seen as a way to strengthen the military alliance between the two countries. Many people believed that it would lead to an increase in US military aid to the Philippines.

However, data from the US Department of Defense shows that US military aid to the Philippines has actually declined in the years since the EDCA was implemented.


Why the Decline?

There are several reasons why US military aid to the Philippines has declined. One reason is that the US has been reducing its military presence in the Asia-Pacific region.

Another reason is that the US is focusing more on other security challenges, such as the rise of China.

Finally, the US is concerned about the human rights record of the Philippine government.


Implications for the Philippines

The decline in US military aid to the Philippines has several implications. One implication is that the Philippines will have to rely more on its own resources to defend itself.

Another implication is that the Philippines will have to forge closer ties with other countries in the region, such as China and Russia.

The decline in US military aid is a challenge for the Philippines. However, it is also an opportunity for the Philippines to reassess its security priorities and to develop a more independent foreign policy.


Comments